BF, Fri. Nov. 14

(Opinion: pro-Chief)

As a grad student at the University, the Chief controversy is new to me. First, let it be known that I am of Native American heritage, and I have spent considerable amounts of time studying Native American history, particularly around Southern Illinois where I grew up. My great-grandmother was full-blooded Seminole, and I have the utmost respect for Native peoples and their traditions. I have taken part in rituals and ceremonies graciously extended to me from friends who attended Haskell Indian Nations University (in Lawrence, KS) while I pursued undergraduate studies at the U. of Kansas. I am not a stranger to Native American issues.

Although there are certain points about the University's portrayal of Chief Illinewek that lack taste and sensitive understanding, I do not feel that the Chief perpetuates harmful stereotypes. For example, the portrayal of Native Americans as lazy drunkards, "Tomahawk chops," etc. are harmful stereotypes that must not be tolerated. I feel that the intent of the Chief is respectable, even though some of the finer points are missed. There will never be full agreement on this issue, but I feel that some middle ground can be found if both sides would seek a compassionate compromise. What Native americans need to understand is that the University is trying to celebrate a rich and wonderful culture, and what non-natives need to understand is that a poor job is being done.

B.F., via the web.